Doesn't matter what you pay, customer service doesn't exist
I am extremely dissatisfied with my recent service experience. After the sale, it feels like customer support ends. A 2026 GV70 with roughly 10,000 miles should not already require repeated service visits.
When I purchased the vehicle, I was told a loaner would be available during service. However, when service was actually needed, I was told the earliest appointment with a loaner was weeks out. I dropped my vehicle off on a Monday, and by Thursday I still had no meaningful update. When I asked for status, I was told the technician was on personal leave until Monday. Then, unexpectedly, the vehicle was marked “ready” the following day. The core concerns were not addressed: for the engine issue, I was told a code was reset with no repair identified; for the noisy ride/window concern (I also provided a video), I was told the issue could not be replicated.
When I picked up my vehicle, the fuel level was at 0%. The vehicle was returned to me essentially out of gas, which is unacceptable. When I asked if the fuel could be restored to the level it had when I dropped it off, a service representative told me it was “not their job” to put gas back in my vehicle despite the expectation that customers return loaner vehicles with fuel.
I requested to speak with a manager, and the service manager reiterated that test-driving the vehicle does not make the dealership responsible for refueling it. This misses the broader issue: basic customer service and accountability. A paying customer should not be asked to leave in a vehicle at empty fuel, especially after an extended service visit with unresolved concerns.
Net Promoter® NPS®, NPS Prism®, and the NPS-related emoticons are registered trademarks of Bain & Company, Inc., Satmetrix Systems, Inc., and Fred Reichheld. Net Promoter Score™ and Net Promoter System™ are service marks of Bain & Company, Inc., and Fred Reichheld.
Attention
We use cookies to personalize content, enable certain functionality, and track site analytics for marketing purposes. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.
When I purchased the vehicle, I was told a loaner would be available during service. However, when service was actually needed, I was told the earliest appointment with a loaner was weeks out. I dropped my vehicle off on a Monday, and by Thursday I still had no meaningful update. When I asked for status, I was told the technician was on personal leave until Monday. Then, unexpectedly, the vehicle was marked “ready” the following day. The core concerns were not addressed: for the engine issue, I was told a code was reset with no repair identified; for the noisy ride/window concern (I also provided a video), I was told the issue could not be replicated.
When I picked up my vehicle, the fuel level was at 0%. The vehicle was returned to me essentially out of gas, which is unacceptable. When I asked if the fuel could be restored to the level it had when I dropped it off, a service representative told me it was “not their job” to put gas back in my vehicle despite the expectation that customers return loaner vehicles with fuel.
I requested to speak with a manager, and the service manager reiterated that test-driving the vehicle does not make the dealership responsible for refueling it. This misses the broader issue: basic customer service and accountability. A paying customer should not be asked to leave in a vehicle at empty fuel, especially after an extended service visit with unresolved concerns.