ReScore Reviews™ (1)
Well apparently, an alignment that meets state standards is not good enough for LMT because I didn't choose to spend twice as much there. They wouldn't even look at the paperwork I got from the place that did the alignment. They were rude and unfriendly when I tried to explain, and ultimately, I feel like they fraudulently took my money. Obviously I refuse to go back there and be treated like that, so I happily paid another place to do my inspection over (and passed with no issue). I fully intend to spread this bad experience by word of mouth to as many people possible and on as many social media sites as possible. I hope they understand that while their prices are ridiculous, customer service is priceless, and they clearly lack it.
Do not waste your money, your time, or your energy here.
As far as the inspection, we failed the front 2 tires and the fact that the vehicle pulled hard to the left. Our estimate was to correct the issues. We called you with an estimate and you declined our repairs. We did not pressure you about your decision. We went out with you to show you the tires.
When you returned Monday, we took you in first thing with no appointment. The inspector road tested your vehicle and said that the vehicle still pulls left. At that point, he took you for a road test to show you the issue. The inspector did look at your paperwork and pointed out the camber was out 1degree which was causing the pull.
The other shop called and spoke with the inspector.The other shop had not road tested the vehicle. We gave him the state troppers name and phone number if he would like to contact him. They claimed that camber was not adjustable which it is! They called us back a short time later and asked how much it would cost to adjust camber and what we do.
If that other shop had properly done the alignment, the vehicle would have passed the inspection and prevented tire wear.
Sounds to me you are directing your anger at the wrong person!!
Lmt Auto Repair
Wiper blades are check for inspection and yours did not pass. We did call you prior to replacement and got your approval.
The first problem was not listing all the problems that is needed to be fix expecting customer to understand their writing on the inspection paper. The second problem is confusing customer: You have a inspection paper and you also give a nicely typed up shop required fixing paper on what's needed to be fix. The typed up paper only stated 3 things that's needed to be fix. I FIXED those 3 items. Then when I come back, you stated other problems and then tell me I am supposed to look at your bad hand-writing on the inspection form and fix those problems. If anyone have ever done inspection, that form is messy, has fractions & numbers, short hand words, and also with items whited out then re-writen. You expect a customer to understand your writing, short hand word, and fractions to know if certain items pass or not. Then you must expect all of us to read your mind or we are profession mechanic to understand what's going on.
On the second time I came back, they did the same thing. They listed only 3-4 small and simple items that's needed to be fixed on the typed up paper form but the other form has 2-3 more items (and i don't even know if those items pass or fail. All it was is a statement like "car drives badly"!!!). I tried to tell them about this, and their response is: "you need to look at this hand writen form". If that's the case, what is the point of typing 1-2 items that is need to be fixed up for? To confuse customer, to give them hope that they only have 1-2 items so you can say "Nope you need to fix these as well" so you can charge them more money again?
This is the problem I have with LTM, the service you provide is nothing compared to a small shop.
They can expect not to get any business from me or any of my colleages. I wish I NEVER went to them to begin with (and my old man agrees).
Had inspection done on the same car 2 times, and paid both times. First time fail and gave me a list of items to fix. Fixed all the items on the printed list. Second time they gave me another list of items that are suspicious in my opinion.
1) fail due to "car drive badly". I looked up safety inspection guidence on google and it say NON-functioning car can still pass safety inspection. Why? The guidence states that as longs as tail lights and brakes work, car running or not, doesn't really matter. Also, I drove the car just fine. Leaves me to question what they are doing with my car.
2) scratch windshield fail inspection. Windshield was scratched due to old wiperblades. Again, I look up the guidence for safety inspection for windshield; the guidence states nothing about scratch windshield, it stated about tinting (Glazing) & wipers blades.
I feel like there is something fishy going on.
We test drove the vehicle and did a full diagnostic on the vehicle. Before coming in we discussed how much the diagnostic fee was.